Association between social vulnerability index and admission urgency for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are not offered equitably to vulnerable population groups. Adequate levels of insurance may narrow gaps among patients with higher social vulnerability index (SVI). Among a national population of individuals with commercial or Medicare insurance, we sought to determine whether SVI was associated with urgency of receipt of TAVR for aortic stenosis. Methods and results: Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (CDM), we identified admissions for TAVR with aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2022. Admission urgency was identified by CDM claims codes. SVI was cross-referenced to patient zip codes and grouped into quintiles. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to predict the probability of a TAVR admission being urgent based on SVI quintiles, adjusting for patient and hospital-level covariates. Results: Among 6680 admissions for TAVR [median age 80 years (interquartile range 75-85), 43.9 % female], 8.5 % (n = 567) were classified as urgent. After adjusting for patient and hospital-level variables, there were no significant differences in the odds of urgent admission for TAVR according to SVI quintiles [OR 5th (greatest social vulnerability) vs 1st quintile (least social vulnerability): 1.29 (95 % CI: 0.90-1.85)]. Conclusions: Among commercial or Medicare beneficiaries with aortic stenosis, SVI was not associated with admission urgency for TAVR. To clarify whether cardiovascular care delivery is improved across SVI with higher paying beneficiaries, future investigation should identify whether relationships between SVI and TAVR urgency vary for Medicaid beneficiaries compared to commercial beneficiaries.

Perception and prevalence of rape: A survey among in-school adolescents in rural Southwest Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: Rape has fast become an issue of relevance to global health cutting across geographical and cultural divides. Most studies on the subject are urban based and among adults. This study was conducted to assess the perception, prevalence and perpetrators among in-school adolescents which represent a unique group and in a rural setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a two-stage cluster sampling technique. A total of 640 respondents completed a pretested interviewer-assisted semi-structured questionnaire. Perception and knowledge scores for rape were calculated and data was analyzed using SPSS version 21. RESULTS: The mean age of respondents was 15.5 (±2.1) years and M: F ratio of 1:1.2. About one-half (46.9%) had poor overall knowledge of rape in the domains assessed. A significant proportion, 266 (41.6%) still subscribe to victim blaming in rape and 336 (52.5%) had negative perception of rape. Eight-five (13.3%) had been raped at least once while 36 (5.6%) self-reported to be perpetrators of rape. The respondents' sex (p=0.015) and present class (0.012) of respondents showed statistically significant association with knowledge of rape. CONCLUSION: The perception of in-school adolescents on rape still leaves much to be desired. Perpetration and experience of rape remain important global health issues.

Association Between Race, Cardiology Care, and the Receipt of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Black patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) have disproportionately worse outcomes than White patients, possibly related to variable involvement of cardiovascular specialists in their clinical care. We sought to determine whether race was associated with cardiology involvement in clinical care during inpatient admission and whether cardiology involvement in care was associated with higher claims of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) a week after hospital discharge. METHODS: Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart (CDM), we included Black and White patients' first hospital admission for PPCM from 2008 to 2021. Cardiology involvement in clinical care was defined as the receipt of attending care from a cardiovascular specialist during admission. GDMT included beta-blockers (BB) for all patients and triple therapy (BB, angiotensin-responsive medications, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) for non-pregnant patients. Logistic regression was used to determine the associations between cardiology involvement in clinical care during admission and (1) patient race and (2) GDMT prescription, adjusting for age and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 668 patients (32.6% Black, 67.4% White, 93.3% commercially insured), there was no significant difference in the odds of cardiology involvement in clinical care by race (aOR: 1.41; 95%CI: 0.87-2.33, P=0.17). Inpatient cardiology care was associated with 2.75 times increased odds of having a prescription claim for GDMT (BB) for White patients (aOR: 2.75; 95%CI 1.50-5.06, P=0.001), and the estimated effect size was similar but not statistically significant for Black patients (aOR: 2.20, 95% CI, 0.84-5.71, P=0.11). The interaction between race and cardiology involvement in clinical care was not statistically significant for the receipt of BB prescription. Among 274 non-pregnant patients with PPCM (37.2% Black, 62.8% White), 5.8% received triple GDMT. Of these, none of the Black patients lacking cardiology care had triple GDMT. However, cardiology involvement in care was not significantly associated with triple GDMT for either race. CONCLUSIONS: Among a commercially insured population within PPCM, race was not associated with cardiology involvement in clinical care during hospitalization. However, cardiology involvement in care was associated with significantly higher odds of prescription claims for BB for only White patients. Additional strategies are needed to support equitable GDMT prescription.

Efficacy of methimazole before the administration of radioactive iodine in the management of Graves' disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of anti-thyroid drugs in conjunction with radioactive iodine therapy in the management of Graves' disease is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of pretreatment with methimazole before the administration of radioactive iodine for the treatment of Graves' disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted at a teaching/tertiary hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed from inception to December, 2021. RESULTS: Five studies with 297 participants were included. There was no difference in the risk of persistent hyperthyroidism when radioactive iodine was used in conjunction with methimazole compared with when radioactive iodine was used alone (relative risk: 1.02, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.62-1.66; P = 0.95, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis based on the duration between discontinuation of methimazole and the administration of radioactive iodine showed a lower risk of persistent hyperthyroidism when methimazole was discontinued within 7 days before radioactive iodine use, although this did not reach statistical significance (risk ratio: 0.85, CI: 0.28-2.58). CONCLUSIONS: The use of methimazole before radioactive iodine administration was not associated with an increased risk of persistent hyperthyroidism. Concerns about medication toxicity and adverse effects should be considered when clinicians make decisions on combination therapies for the treatment of Graves' disease. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020150013, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=150013.

Efficacy of methimazole before the administration of radioactive iodine in the management of Graves' disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The efficacy of anti-thyroid drugs in conjunction with radioactive iodine therapy in the management of Graves' disease is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of pretreatment with methimazole before the administration of radioactive iodine for the treatment of Graves' disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted at a teaching/tertiary hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed from inception to December, 2021. RESULTS: Five studies with 297 participants were included. There was no difference in the risk of persistent hyperthyroidism when radioactive iodine was used in conjunction with methimazole compared with when radioactive iodine was used alone (relative risk: 1.02, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.62-1.66; P = 0.95, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis based on the duration between discontinuation of methimazole and the administration of radioactive iodine showed a lower risk of persistent hyperthyroidism when methimazole was discontinued within 7 days before radioactive iodine use, although this did not reach statistical significance (risk ratio: 0.85, CI: 0.28-2.58). CONCLUSIONS: The use of methimazole before radioactive iodine administration was not associated with an increased risk of persistent hyperthyroidism. Concerns about medication toxicity and adverse effects should be considered when clinicians make decisions on combination therapies for the treatment of Graves' disease. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020150013, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=150013.